I have to see everything he ever did. From director Arthur Penn, this fast-paced, gunslinging gangster film was considered nothing short of revolutionary. It introduced American audiences to a new kind of glamourized, romanticized violence they had never seen before. Some audience and critics found the blood-splattering to be in poor taste, but others were fascinated, and many credit the film as the origin of the pulp noir genre think Sin City , Million Dollar Baby , and of course, Pulp Fiction.
The film undoubtedly glossed over some facts: Texas Ranger Frank Hamer came off particularly poorly in the film—the couple captures him, humiliates him and sets him free, which never happened. Where to stream Bonnie and Clyde. This made-for-TV film from director Gary Hoffman never got much attention—so little, in fact, that you can still watch the entire thing on YouTube.
The answer is no, no it is not. Is it good? Is it historically accurate? Obviously not. Our heroes pick up the wrong fork, and the basic figure of fun in the American theatre and American movies is the man who puts on airs. Bonnie and Clyde and their partners in crime are comically bad bank robbers, and the backdrop of poverty makes their holdups seem pathetically tacky, yet they rob banks and kill people; Clyde and his good-natured brother are so shallow they never think much about anything, yet they suffer and die.
Melodramas and gangster movies and comedies were always more our speed than prestigious, distinguished pictures; the French directors who grew up on American pictures found poetry in our fast action, laconic speech, plain gestures.
The scene that shows the gnomish gang member called C. In many ways, this method is more effective; we feel the violence more because so much is left to our imaginations. The dirty reality of death—not suggestions but blood and holes—is necessary. It is a kind of violence that says something to us; it is something that movies must be free to use. And it is just because artists must be free to use violence—a legal right that is beginning to come under attack—that we must also defend the legal rights of those filmmakers who use violence to sell tickets, for it is not the province of the law to decide that one man is an artist and another man a no-talent.
Too many people—including some movie reviewers—want the law to take over the job of movie criticism; perhaps what they really want is for their own criticisms to have the force of law. They look at the world and blame the movies. We see that killers are not a different breed but are us without the insight or understanding or self-control that works of art strengthen.
Mayer did not turn us into a nation of Andy Hardys, and if, in a film, we see a frightened man wantonly take the life of another, it does not encourage us to do the same, any more than seeing an ivory hunter shoot an elephant makes us want to shoot one. It may, on the contrary, so sensitize us that we get a pang in the gut if we accidentally step on a moth.
Do they, as some people have charged, confer glamour on violence? Nobody in the movie gets pleasure from violence. Is the charge based on the notion that simply by their presence in the movie Warren Beatty and Faye Dunaway make crime attractive? Would having criminals played by dwarfs or fatties discourage crime? It seems rather doubtful. The accusation that the beauty of movie stars makes the anti-social acts of their characters dangerously attractive is the kind of contrived argument we get from people who are bothered by something and are clutching at straws.
Actors and actresses are usually more beautiful than ordinary people. And why not? We did not want her to be ordinary-looking. Why should we be deprived of the pleasure of beauty? Garbo could be all women in love because, being more beautiful than life, she could more beautifully express emotions.
It is a supreme asset for actors and actresses to be beautiful; it gives them greater range and greater possibilities for expressiveness. The handsomer they are, the more roles they can play; Olivier can be anything, but who would want to see Ralph Richardson, great as he is, play Antony?
Actors and actresses who are beautiful start with an enormous advantage, because we love to look at them. The joke in the glamour charge is that Faye Dunaway has the magazine-illustration look of countless uninterestingly pretty girls, and Warren Beatty has the kind of high-school good looks that are generally lost fast.
Good roles do that for actors. His business sense may have improved his timing. The role of Clyde Barrow seems to have released something in him. It is, however, a tribute to his performance that one singles this failure out. Actors before Brando did not mumble and scratch and show their sweat; dramatists before Tennessee Williams did not make explicit a particular substratum of American erotic fantasy; movie directors before Orson Welles did not dramatize the techniques of filmmaking; directors before Richard Lester did not lay out the whole movie as cleverly as the opening credits; actresses before Marilyn Monroe did not make an asset of their ineptitude by turning faltering misreadings into an appealing style.
Each, in a large way, did something that people had always enjoyed and were often embarrassed or ashamed about enjoying. Here the script seems weak. She is made too warmly sympathetic—and sympathetic in a style that antedates the style of the movie.
Her attitude toward her mother is too loving. There could be something funny about her wanting to run home to her mama, but, as it has been done, her heading home, running off through the fields, is unconvincing—incompletely motivated. Faye Dunaway has a sixties look anyway—not just because her eyes are made up in a sixties way and her hair is wrong but because her personal style and her acting are sixties.
This pair is the most infamous criminal couple in American history. Their hijinks are iconic for having taken their passion for each other and turned it into a mutual passion for robbery. Bonnie and Clyde stars Warren Beaty and Faye Dunaway, who were venerated for their fantastic performances. The audiences of were not at all prepared for the level of violence in this film, which was still unheard-of in that time period.
Two former Texas Rangers embark on a journey to apprehend the notorious fugitives. The Highwaymen includes wiretapping families, breaking jurisdiction, and shooting children. A gun-obsessed war veteran and a daredevil female sharpshooter meet at a carnival and hit it off. Their mutual love for firearms, chaos, and each other cause them to go on a robbery crime spree. Sociopath lovers will love Gun Crazy.
0コメント